Sunday, August 31, 2014

Beyond Michael Brown

Which Michael Brown do you see? The victim, or the criminal ? Or will you be able to see that this is much more than the story of a police stop that went horribly wrong ?  Although I will discuss what happened this report is about much more than the problem of crime in the black community, or even police brutality. This report is beyond that. It is about the systematic dismantling of ALL American’s rights. When you examine what I have to show you, you will be shocked to find out the fact which the establishment has been keeping from you until it was too late. The fact that your rights are gone.


Do you understand what I am saying ? Your rights are gone. Not just black people’s rights. Not just criminal’s rights. ALL American’s right’s are gone. Police have been given the right, by their corporate state masters to shoot you whenever they please, as long as they can justify it later by saying you were going to do something, solely in their mind. Not that they had evidence you broke a particular law, but merely a “reasonable” feeling.


Why don’t we begin by looking at what happened ?


11:48 AM   Officer Darren Wilson responds to 911 call of a sick child.


11:52 AM   911 call of a strong arm robbery ( allegedly Michael Brown and his friend ),

                    at a local grocery store.


                   Officer Wilson never hears about the robbery.

                   ( Although police version now says he did hear about the robbery )


BETWEEN 12:01 PM and 2:00 PM    Depending on different versions and witnesses.


The Slate reports:

Two competing narratives quickly emerged about the incident, one from police who say that the officer acted in self-defense and one from several witnesses who have said that Wilson was the aggressor. What both sides agree on is that Brown was unarmed at the time of the shooting. County prosecutors began presenting evidence to a grand jury 11 days later, but it will likely take months before jurors reach a decision on whether Wilson should be charged. If he ultimately is, many details of the official investigation could remain sealed until trial, making it likely that questions about what happened in the moments before Wilson opened fire will remain unanswered for the foreseeable future.


The best that I can put together from my research is something like the following scenario happened. Michael Brown and his friend were walking down the street and officer Darren Brown told them to get off the street. Words were exchanged and perhaps the boys did not get on to the sidewalk in the manner he wanted, without radioing the call in or asking for back up officer Wilson attempted to drag Michael Brown into the police car. A struggle insured and officer Wilson fired his gun at Michael Brown. Most likely shooting him the first of 6 times.


At this time while fighting for his life he appears to have struck officer Wilson, and fled the police car. Michael Brown attempted to run away, but officer Wilson ran after him, discharging his weapon as he was running, and striking Michael several more times. At no time does officer Wilson call in for back up, or to even report shots fired and subject fleeing.


Michael eventually stops and turns around, kneels on the ground and puts his hands up in the air. The universal sign of surrender. But instead of cuffing him at that point, officer Wilson fires into the head of Michael Brown.

Everything That Went Wrong In Ferguson / The Slate:



I have worked with inner city high school students. I’m 6 feet tall and quite a few of the young men were bigger than me. I can think of one young man who was well over 300 lbs and could be prone to violence. In fact I remember I once put myself between him and another boy who were about to fight, and I was able to talk him down, just by using my words. You see, these young men may be as big as houses, but their minds are still teenagers. In most altercations an “adult” can reason with them. If however you stoop to their level, get loud, aggressive, or talk down to them, things can quickly go wrong, and physical violence become the result.

I interviewed a former federal law enforcement officer who said:

“There is always a less than lethal option, baton, pepper spray, taser etc. Police officers have it extra tough because they work alone most times, this is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard and still speak out about it to this a day. With a job this dangerous, there should always be two officers assigned together. I ran a crew of 5 and when apprehending a suspect or having an altercation I always instructed my guys to have one draw their weapon (usually me) and one with less than lethal munitions or spray/taser. We are dealing with human beings, who we know nothing about. Drug addictions, mental problems etc-you dont know. That’s why you try to preserve life! Very rarely does a physical altercation with an unarmed suspect need to be grounds for deadly force. I was successful in force control , for example during Hurricane Katrina, in the biggest most dangerous wards in New Orleans, because I treated people, dope boys and all, with respect and like people. Most physical alterations CAN BE AVOIDED WITH YOUR MOUTH…


Each state, and municipality will vary some, but as you will see officers like the one above, are no longer receiving this type of training. The days of Mayberry and Andy Griffith are gone unfortunately. The system has been dismantled and replaced with a shoot first mentality. This was done on purpose, as I will show you, in order to bring in a police state to control the American people for the establishment’s goal of world government.




According to present Missouri law…

Law enforcement officer's use of force in making an arrest:

563.046. 1. A law enforcement officer need not retreat or desist from efforts to effect the arrest, or from efforts to prevent the escape from custody, of a person he reasonably believes to have committed an offense because of resistance or threatened resistance of the arrestee. In addition to the use of physical force authorized under other sections of this chapter, he is, subject to the provisions of subsections 2 and 3, justified in the use of such physical force as he reasonably believes is immediately necessary to effect the arrest or to prevent the escape from custody.

2. The use of any physical force in making an arrest is not justified under this section unless the arrest is lawful or the law enforcement officer reasonably believes the arrest is lawful.

3. A law enforcement officer in effecting an arrest or in preventing an escape from custody is justified in using deadly force only

(1) When such is authorized under other sections of this chapter; or

(2) When he reasonably believes that such use of deadly force is immediately necessary to effect the arrest and also reasonably believes that the person to be arrested

(a) Has committed or attempted to commit a felony; or

(b) Is attempting to escape by use of a deadly weapon; or

(c) May otherwise endanger life or inflict serious physical injury unless arrested without delay.

4. The defendant shall have the burden of injecting the issue of justification under this section.






       The roll out of the psychological operations that ensued, appears very familiar to me. The same forces that were behind the whole Zimmerman thing are back, both spiritually, and materially. The money flowing to the shooter, the media campaign, and the victimization of the victim and his "background". It's the same script they are using, along with the usual inside manipulation of the justice system policies and procedures, and the editing of what gets put out on video and print.

And the same people will buy it.. and convince themselves the victim was guilty..


Zimmerman however, was just the beginning, and this is all to soften you to the idea that suspecting criminality is justification, and the same thing as evidence of criminality. And if it was just a white / black thing perhaps you might be able to take some solace if you are not black, but I am here to wake you to the fact that the police state is for EVERYONE.


You see they are not training just to fire on black people, or even just on people who are rioting. Although that is who they will exercise it on first. They are training how to quell ANY protest, and how to lay siege to entire cities. We were told to be fearful of a Red Dawn, but all this time they have been preparing for a Blue Dawn (or in actuality a Black Dawn, since that is the color they like to dress their SWAT teams in).



An Isreali soldier warns that American soldiers are being sent to them, and trained by them to treat American citizens as Palestinian combatants:


“If you don’t care about Palestinians… You guys should know: YOU are next in line. The next one who will die from a tear gas canister into his chest will be in Zucotti Park, will be in Denver, will be in Oakland, in San Francisco. It is happening here already. It is happening to different people, to people of color, to immigrants in this country, it is already happening. You guys are next in line. The next one who will die from the brutality of the police will be YOUR son or daughter. Our army is training your police to see them as their enemy, because Palestinians are our enemy. When they come back YOU are their enemy…


-          Eran Efrati – An Israeli Soldier’s Story:




Army Manual On Civil Diusturbances:

( from an article by Dave Hodges in D.C. Clothesline )

The new Army manual, known as ATP 3-39.33, provides discussion and techniques about civil disturbances and crowd control operations that occur in the continental United States (CONUS) and outside the continental United States (OCONUS).

This document, published earlier this year, promises to change the way the “authorities” deal with protesters, even peaceful ones. The consequences of ATP 39.33 could prove deadly for testers. Further, the provisions of this Army manual could prove to be the end of the First Amendment right to peaceably assemble.protesters. Further, the provisions of this Army manual could prove to be the end of the First Amendment right to peaceably assemble.



The manual states that  “Civil unrest may range from simple, nonviolent protests that address specific issues, to events that turn into full-scale riots“. This section of the manual clearly states that protesting is a right protected by the Constitution. However, the authorities leave themselves an out to “legally” engage in lethal force toward protesters when the manual states that “peaceful protests can turn into full-scale riots” and field commanders have the right to make that determination. Subsequently, all protests, peaceful or not, need to be managed by the potential for violence. In other words, all protests are to be considered to be violent and handled accordingly. This certainly explains the violent manhandling of the media by the DHS controlled and militarized police in Ferguson, MO.

On the surface, the Posse Comitatus Act (18 USC 1385) act should prevent the Army from deploying the troops in the midst of a protest that is not on the scale of something like the 1992 LA Riots. However, the Army claims exemption from Posse Comitatus in the four following areas.

§                     A state requests federal military assistance

§                     When ordinary enforcement means are unworkable

§                     Domestic violence or conspiracy to hinder execution of State or Federal law

§                     Upon request of the Secret Service, to assist in carrying out its statutory duties to protect government officials and major political candidates from physical harm.


New Army Manual Calls For Lethal Force Against Peaceful Protesters:


The phrase “unlawful obstructions or rebellion against the authority of the United States, use of the militia or Armed Forces is authorized”  this permits the federal government from being demonstrated against. An act of demonstration, or the most benign demonstrations of civil disobedience gives the government the authority to take “deadly action” against the public .

In the manual, any disruption of federal law can be decisively dealt with by the federal government. The phrase “…conspiracy to hinder execution of State or Federal law, the use of the militia or Armed Forces is authorized” is a telling passage of this Army document. If 10 USC 333 is applied to the letter of the written Army policy, the protesters who recently objected to illegal aliens being deposited in Murietta, California, could be subject to deadly force. Further, the protesters in Ferguson could be subject to the use of lethal force as well

The manual is quite clear in its intent which is to eliminate the act of protesting from the American landscape. More disturbingly, the right to summarily execute peaceful protesters is contained in this Army manual due to the purposeful ambiguity of when it is appropriate to use deadly force against protesters. This Army manual is an example of hard core, in-your-face martial law befitting the most violent regimes in the history of the planet.

There is another message contained in the manual and that is the clear anticipation that the American people are going to feel the need to be protesting in earnest in the foreseeable future. What exactly are the American people going to feel compelled to protest that remains unspecified in this manual? Could it be resistance to mandatory Ebola vaccinations? Could we be looking at food riots in the future? Will it be a currency collapse that puts Americans in the street? Will America rise up and say no to the plans for World War III and the coming conscription of both potential military personnel and a civilian labor slave force as described under Executive Order 13603?



What I hope you take from this report is that we, the people, need to work together for each other, because the government, military, and financial interests are organizing against us, and stripping us of more and more rights.

It is time to reign in our law enforcement community. Hopefully you can see that you and I are Michael Brown. What we let be done to the least of us, we will be letting done to all of us. Wasn’t that the lesson from Nazi Germany ? First they came for the socialists, but I was not socialist. Then they came for the Jews, but I was not Jewish. Then they came for me, and there was no one left to help me…


In the government’s eyes:


~ Dr. Kazi Kearse PsyD.
   Author of:  "Awakening: The Rise of Truth Begins"